Insights to Obtaining Freedom
Explore vital information on legal concepts, rights, and codes for your freedom journey.
This page is intended to direct you to a path of obtaining freedom from the matrix, the system of color-of-law, DeFacto government that you have been entrapped in. If you just arrived at this website and this page is the first page you see, go to “The Story” or “Home” page to get an idea of what I am suggesting that you free yourself from. The government I am referring to is the US government, a.k.a. the US, the USA, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the United States of America. You may ask, “What’s the difference in all of those versions?” The real difference is none. They are all the same. They are all a federal corporation inside of the District of Columbia, “D.C.” All US citizens live inside of the District of Columbia. This is where things get crazy. When Washington, D.C. was originally established in 1791, the federal district was designed as a 10-mile by 10-mile square, making up a total area of 100 square miles. This included land from both Maryland and Virginia. However, in 1846, the portion of the district that had been ceded by Virginia (about 31 square miles) was returned to the state in an event known as retrocession. This left the district with its current size of approximately 68.34 square miles, as part of the original square remains part of Maryland today. Within the Uniform Commercial Code, UCC § 9-307(h) it says that the United States is located inside of the District of Columbia. But geographically, D.C. is located inside of the United States. So, in essence when you have one thing inside of another thing that is inside that thing, they must both be the same thing. With that in mind, the United States is the District of Columbia and vice versa. So, if the United States is inside the District of Columbia, wouldn’t it make sense to say that the size of the United States is 68.34 square miles, the size of D.C.? Let me break it down even simpler. The United States exists on paper only. It exists on paper only because it is a corporation acting as government. How can it act as government? Because it was created as a corporation and we were told it is our government, therefore by our ignorance and tacit consent, it exists. It is a ***DE FACTO government. The original government as was created by the founding fathers was (and still is) a republic, a *DE JURE government. The *DE JURE government is a government of the land, one of **equity. Anytime someone tells you something is a fact, it is a fact until it is rebutted. If the claim is ignored by acquiescence, it is presumed to be fact. This is the case with the United States government, a legal fiction, claiming that it is our government and that it has power over We the People where in-fact, it is not a true government and does not have power over the ones that created it. Only by the consent of the people does it have any standing. Without the consent of the people, it fails to maintain power. We the people who are not under the power of the US, (not US citizens) are the true authors of law. Usurpation by the creation and use of the 14th amendment of the constitution of the United States of America, We the People were redefined as persons (US persons). A person by definition of legal dictionaries is a corporation unless otherwise defined. A corporation is a person by that same definition. A US person is a US citizen. The word citizen comes from the Middle English citien, derived from the Anglo-French citeain, which traces back to “cite“ (meaning “city”) from the Latin civitas (“state” or “community”). It originally referred to someone belonging to a city or community with (civil) rights and responsibilities. The term citizen fundamentally represents membership within a structured political or communal entity, implying legal recognition and certain obligations. By this meaning a citizen/person/resident/taxpayer is part of a DE FACTO (legal, not lawful) government structure. It is a democracy, not a republic. The 14th amendment, which was not properly ratified, was a big part of the annihilation of the republic that was founded in the beginning. A republic government retains the rights of the people; the constitution recognizes and protects those God-given unalienable rights and provides guidance to the government in doing so. A democracy allows 51% of the people to bully the 49% into submission of whatever they want to happen. In this case, the constitution is suspended, although the government of democracy acts like it defends and supports the constitution, but it actually doesn’t. In this case, the rights of the individual man or woman are reduced to merely civil rights and privileges provided to them by the government. Their unalienable, God-given rights are waived in order to have civil rights and privileges and in nearly all cases, those rights are sold back to people in the form of privileges, i.e. permission by license. Thanks to the bankruptcy of the republic and the creation of the US corporation (in Delaware) Abraham Lincoln managed to reduce those people unknowingly, and tacitly consenting to be a person (a corporation) and become surety for the debts of the US corporation.
(*DE JURE. Of right; legitimate; lawful; by right and just title. In this sense it is the contrary of de facto)
(**EQUITY. In its broadest and most general signification, this term denotes the spirit and the habit of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate the intercourse [commerce] of men with men, —the rule of doing to all others as we desire them to do to us; or, as it is expressed by Justinian, “to live honestly, to harm nobody, to render to every man his due.” It is therefore the synonym of natural right or justice. But in this sense its obligation is ethical rather than jural, and its discussion belongs to the sphere of morals. It is grounded in the precepts of the conscience, not in any sanction of positive law.)
(***DE FACTO GOVERNMENT. One that maintains itself by a display of force against the will of the rightful legal [lawful] government and is successful, at least temporarily, in overturning the institutions of the rightful legal [lawful] government by setting up its own in lieu thereof.)
“Sovereign citizen”
The following download link provides you a document that is an affidavit rebutting false claims and the mischaracterization of sovereigns, nationals, freemen, non-resident aliens in respect to the U.S. (Federal Corporation,) D.C., i.e. the District of Columbia. When “officials” or cops encounter a national, non-resident alien, they usually go right for the degrading “sovereign citizen” designation of the national. If a national presents documents and unrebutted affidavits to the “officials” showing their status as a national/non-resident alien to D.C., then they claim that the national is practicing “paper terrorism.” These actions are a coup attempt to belittle or intimidate sovereigns. The use of the word “sovereign” or “national” to describe oneself engages them into trying to take control and jurisdiction over the living man. I have put together a rebuttal of false claims, such as “Sovereign citizen” misnaming; a tactic of deflection of their wrongdoing against the living man, which is you. You can download this document at no cost and enter your relevant information. After you do, take it to a notary and notarize it then file it in the county clerk’s office of the county you live on in order to put it into the public venue. If they do not rebut it, then it stands as truth. The document is free of cost but you can always make a donation if you like and it will be very appreciated. If you have any questions or need help comprehending any part regarding this, email me, Bub-Byrne at admin@raveninfo.com, I’ll do my best to help asap.
Rebuttal of False Claims Regarding Lawful Assertion of Rights
In this affidavit, you’ll see the name of the one making the claim. In this case, it is a fictitious name. In front of that name you’ll notice that it uses the prefix of “Master”, instead of Mister or Mr. The reason this is done, the designation of mister is a slave reference. A reference to Master is a secured party designation, one who is the creditor. A Master is free; a mister is not. I claim this position as Master and it remains unrebutted, and as such it is estopped. Estopple means, “To be legally barred or prevented from asserting something—usually because of your own prior actions, statements, or silence.” To be silent, is to acquiesce; silence equals tacit consent.
Maxims of Law, “One who does not deny, admits.”
“Qui tacet consentire videtur, ubi loqui debuit ac potuit.”
“He who is silent is taken to consent, when he ought to have spoken and was able to.”
“Silence to a controversy is considered consent to any judgment.”
Click here to watch this Tik Tok on the Titanic sinking and its relation to the Federal Reserve act.
Empowering Knowledge
No part of RavenInfo.com is to be construed to be or to be taken as legal advice. Everything within RavenInfo.com is to be used as educational or entertainment purposes.
Raveninfo.com, Raven Info All rights reserved – UCC 1-308 – Without prejudice – Non-assumpsit
Raven Info ©2025