Legal Definitions - Raven Info

Legal Definitions will be particular words taken in sections from Black’s Law Dictionary (BLD) and restructured or altered as much as possible to try to keep from the violating the owner’s copyright of that book. The meanings will be the same. The definitions may not be in alphabetical order but rather in the order I need it to be to get you understand what the matrix is doing in its trickery.

Somethings you need to keep in mind is that corporations (corpse-oration, a dead thing) can only do business with corporations and living men can only do business with living men. The constitution protects the rights of men to enter into or not enter into contracts, but the government and its controllers wanted the ability for living men to do business with corporations and vice versa. To cause this to happen, they created the strawman, a dead entity with your name in all capital letters (all cap). They did this when the STATE issued a birth certificate. Instead of writing your name in this format, John Henry Doe, they wrote it like this, JOHN HENRY DOE. All dead entities have names with all cap letters including tombstones (Tombstones after the early 1930’s). As I said, corporations are dead entities.

Now enters the first definition:

PERSON: A man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the right to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes. The word in its natural and usual signification includes women as well as men. (1) Term may include artificial beings, as corporations, quasi-corporations, territorial corporations, and foreign corporations… It may include partnerships... It has been held that when the word person is used in a legislative act, natural persons will be intended unless something appear in the context to show that it applies to artificial persons… (2) as a rule corporations will be considered persons within the statutes unless the intention of the legislature is manifestly to exclude them. A child en ventre sa mere (Latin for “in the womb of the mother”) is not a person… (3) Persons are the subject of rights and duties; and, as a subject of a right, the person is the object of the correlative duty, and conversely. The subject of a right has been called the person of inherence; the subject of a duty, the person of incidence… (4) Every full citizen is a person; other human beings, namely, subjects who are not citizens, may be persons. But not every human being is necessarily a person, for a person is capable of rights and duties, and (5) there may well be human beings having no legal rights… A person is such, not because he is human, (6) but because rights and duties are ascribed (assigned) to him. (7) The person is the legal subject or substance of which the rights and duties are attributes.]

BLD (Black’s Law Dictionary) says that the “person” (7)(3) is the legal subject. “Subject” per BLD definition says that “Men in free governments are subjects as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy rights and franchises; as subjects they are bound to obey the laws. So, citizens are subjects and are bound to obey the laws. Franchise means “A privilege or right officially granted by a government or authority.” One Maxim of law says: “That which one creates, one controls.” Did the government create us? No, it did not! How can it grant anything? It is dead. You can see from above that a (4) person is a subject, is a citizen, is a corporation, and has (civil) rights assigned to him and capable of rights and duties. A person is not human; therefore, it is dead as in never lived. A natural person is human, a legal person is not. The matrix requires that in order for the human and the corporation (2) to do business, that the human (5) declares that he is a corporation (1). How can this happen? For example, when the judge in a court says, “JOHN HENRY DOE raise your hand.” You raise your hand. He asks further, “Are you this person, JOHN HENRY DOE?” When You answer yes, then you are saying that you are the strawman, a non-living entity, the ens legis, the STATE issued birth certificate and as such it causes you to become the trustee of the trust the court is trying to administrate. You are now dead. Now, you can do business with corporations and the court falls into that description. In turn, corporations can now do business with you because, you by proxy of their legalese (legal word magic), said that you are dead. As trustee, you, the living man have now become liable for everything the surety/strawman/trustee did that may have violated a statute or policy the court is trying the strawman for. Now, as a surety/strawman/trustee, you have no unalienable rights, you have entered into a contract with a corporation, the court. The constitution does not apply to you now and is suspended. You have no 1st amendment rights, no 4th amendments rights… none of them. You are now a dead thing, and things do not have rights.

STRAWMAN: The definition for “Strawman” first appears in the 6th Edition of Black’s Law Dictionary. The definition of Strawman is typically defined as a “person” who acts as an intermediary or nominal party in a transaction, often to conceal the identity of the true party [the living man] or to achieve a purpose that might not be directly permissible. This concept is used in various legal contexts, such as property transactions or corporate dealings.

LAWFUL: Legal; warranted or authorized by the law; having the qualifications prescribed by law; not contrary to nor forbidden by the law.

LEGAL:

Conforming to the law; according to law; required or permitted by law; not forbidden
or discountenanced by law; good and effectual in law.
Proper or sufficient to be recognized by the law; cognizable in the courts; competent or adequate to fulfill the requirements of the law.
Cognizable in courts of law, as distinguished from courts of equity; construed or governed by the rules and principles of law, in contradistinction to rules of equity.
Posited by the courts as the inference or imputation of the law, as a matter of construction, rather than established by actual proof; e. g., legal malice. See Lawful.
Created by law.
Lawful; of or pertaining to law.

“The principal distinction between the terms “lawful” and “legal” is that “lawful” contemplates the substance of law, “legal” the form of law. To say of an act that it is “lawful” implies that it is authorized, sanctioned, or at any rate not forbidden, by law. To say that it is “legal” implies that it is done or performed in accordance with the forms and usages of law, or in a technical manner. In this sense “illegal” approaches the meaning of “invalid.” For example, a contract or will, executed without the required formalities, might be said to be invalid or illegal, but could not be described as unlawful. Further, the word “lawful” more clearly implies an ethical content than does “legal.” The latter goes no further than to denote compliance, with positive, technical, or formal rules; while the former usually imports a moral substance or ethical permissibility. A further distinction is that the word “legal” is used as the synonym of “constructive,” which “lawful” is not. Thus “legal fraud” is fraud implied or inferred by law, or made out by construction. “Lawful fraud” would be a contradiction of terms. Again, “legal” is used as the antithesis of “equitable.”

ANTITHESIS: Refers to a person, thing, or idea that is the direct opposite of another. For example, love might be considered the antithesis of hate. As such, as described above by the matrix itself, what is legal (a legislative, municipal control factor) is not lawful (equity). (equity = morally or ethically fair.)

Author’s note: In these definitions created by those who work in the dark magic, dead things, even they say that “legal” is under the authority of “lawful” or in other words the true law. But they continually write policies, statutes and regulations that work against the true law and against the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It is an emoluments violation, a fiduciary violation against all beneficiaries, a violation against the God given rights of We the People, the sovereign man. That which is “legal” outright violates the unalienable rights of men recognized by the constitution that these self-declared dead creatures swear an oath to defend. How can one that is holding a position of power create so-called laws that are repugnant to the constitution that they swear to uphold? It is called hypocrisy. They are liars and thieves.

Violations against the constitution

THE CONSTITUTION: Supremacy Clause, Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution.

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

This clause establishes that the U.S. Constitution takes precedence over state laws.

The principle that unconstitutional laws can be ignored is rooted in legal precedent and constitutional interpretation. One notable case is Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham (1969), where the U.S. Supreme Court stated that a [natural] person faced with an unconstitutional law “may ignore it and engage with impunity in the exercise of the right” that the law infringes upon.

This idea aligns with the broader concept that unconstitutional laws are void and unenforceable. The judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, has the authority to declare laws unconstitutional, rendering them invalid under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

The landmark case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review, which allows American courts to strike down laws and statutes that violate the U.S. Constitution.

CITIZEN: A member of a free city or jural society, (civitas,) possessing all the rights and privileges which can be enjoyed by any person under its constitution and government, and subject to the corresponding duties. “Citizens” are members of community inspired to common goal, who, in associated relations, submit themselves to rules of conduct for the promotion of general welfare
and conservation of individual as well as collective rights.

Authors note: A citizen is a “subject”, a “person” that “enjoys” possessing rights and privileges who submit themselves to rules of conduct. Does this sound like freedom? A subject is a slave, a person, unless noted to be a natural person is a corporation. Submit equals submission, correct? Being free is being submissive? Not in the slightest.

INDIVIDUAL: As a noun, this term denotes a single person as distinguished from a group or
class, and also, very commonly, a private or natural person as distinguished from a partnership,
corporation, or association; but it is said that this restrictive signification is not necessarily inherent in the word, and that it may, in proper cases, include artificial persons.

Per Bouviers Law Dictionary

SOLE: Alone, single; used in contradistinction to joint or married. A sole tenant, therefore, is one who holds lands in his own right, without being joined with any other. A feme sole is a single woman; a sole corporation is one composed of only one natural person.

PROPRIETOR. The owner.

Authors note: Here, the definition of “Sole” means that a natural person is a sole corporation and as proprietor he is the owner. This by trickery of words, it makes a natural person become the surety, the trustee, the ens legis and the owner of it per the definition of Proprietor. To claim the position of sole proprietor places you in the jurisdiction of the corporate United States. All corporations are tied together like an octopus with the head being the corporate US. All corporations are dead/non-living entities.

ENS LEGIS: L. Latin. A creature of the law; an artificial being, as contrasted with a natural person. Applied to corporations, considered as deriving their existence entirely from the law.

Note: Some people have a hard time negotiating the pronunciation of this Latin word. It is ens like “ins” and legis like “lee jis”. I’ve heard it called “ens leggies.” Not quite right… 😉

RES: Latin. In the civil law. A thing; an object. This has reference to the fundamental division of the Institutes, that all law relates either to persons, to things, or to actions.

Revisit the definition above of “Person.” A person is a thing. Things have no unalienable rights. Things do not own things. Things are owned and are subjects.

RESIDE: Live, dwell, abide, sojourn, stay, remain, lodge.

RESIDENT: One who has his residence in a place.

RESIDENCE: A factual place of abode. Living in a particular locality.

As “domicile” and “residence” are usually in the same place, they are frequently used as if they had the same meaning, but they are not identical terms, for a person may have two places of residence, as in the city and country, but only one domicile. Residence means living in particular locality, but domicile means living in that locality with intent to make it a fixed and permanent home.
Residence simply requires bodily presence as an inhabitant in a given place, while domicile requires bodily presence in that place and also an intention to make it one’s domicile.

“Residence” demands less intimate local ties than “domicile,” but “domicile” allows absence for indefinite period if intent to return remains. “Residence” has a meaning dependent on context and purpose of statute. Words “residence” and “domicile”- may have an identical or variable meaning depending on subject-matter and context of statute.

Also, a tenant, who was obliged to reside on his lord’s land, and not to depart from the same; called, also, “homme levant et couchant,”

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary

RESIDENCE: There is a difference between a man’s residence and his domicile. He may have his domicile in Philadelphia, and still, he may have a residence in New York; for although a man can have but one domicile, he may have several residences. A residence is generally transient in its nature, it becomes a domicile when it is taken up animo manendi.

Author’s note: With this definition of “residence” in mind, it is evident that to be a resident at a residence is generally to not be at one’s domicile. It is to be in a different location than one’s domicile, typically to do business. It places a living man/woman in a foreign land. Pay attention to this definition as we will explore the definition of United States soon.

TENANT: one who holds lands of another; one who has the temporary use and occupation of real property owned by another person, (called the “landlord,”) the duration and terms of his tenancy being usually fixed by an instrument called a “lease.” One who occupies another’s land or premises in subordination to such others title and with his assent, express or implied.

Author’s note: By this definition, it is evident that to be a tenant is to commit to a commercial event being the renting or leasing of the property. As such, one’s location by jurisdiction is corporate by nature and is a business transaction; therefore, one is a resident through that transaction, at least in the eyes of the “matrix”. In order to not be a resident committing the business transaction of renting/leasing and placing oneself in the jurisdiction of the Federal Corporation called the United States, the claim of residence or being a resident must be rebutted, either in writing or verbally when it is presumed.

OCCUPATION: Vocation. That which principally takes up one’s time, thought, and energies; especially, one’s regular business or employment; also, whatever one follows as the means of making a livelihood. Particular business, profession, trade, or calling which engages individuals time and efforts, employment in which one regularly engages or vocation of his life.