The Story - Raven Info

By: Bub-Byrne

Once upon a time…

Sometimes, when someone tells important information, they tend to think that you already know the foundation or background of the information they are telling you. This causes data gaps in what you learn, and you are left trying to piece together the missing parts. I still have some data gaps but not as bad as I once did, and that gap is closing daily. As was mentioned on the home page, “Nothing is as it seems.” You’ve surely wondered how we are live in the “Home of the free” but everything we do is not free. You have been tricked into trading your unalienable rights for civil rights and privileges. You’ve traded freedom for security under the guise that it is good for you and the benefits of that are provided to you for free from the government. Nothing is free. The government can’t give anything to you without first taking it from you, and even then, you only receive a small portion of what was taken from you. Have you ever wondered how your God given unalienable rights were converted into privileges? Did you even realize that it happened? It was done by contracting. Everything is offer and acceptance. That is the basis of a contract. The government offered to let you fish wherever you want, drive wherever you want, marry whoever you want, and permission (a license) will be granted to you as soon as you pay a fee. Now you have the privilege to fish, hunt, drive, marry, etc. But it doesn’t go without attachments of the State. Your marriage is now between you, your spouse and the State. The State now can tell you “When” you can fish, hunt etcetera, because the State is the third party of the trust that was created, the contract. A license is permission to do something that would otherwise be illegal. The State is a legal creature. You are a living man or woman. You are a lawful, living creature, not a dead one like a government entity, or legal entity created by the State called the “ens legis”. “Legal” is of man. “Lawful” is of God. Legal is the undoing of God’s law and by that very description, what is legal is not lawful. An example of legal being the undoing of God’s law would be the legal same-sex marriage. This is not lawful under God’s Law, but it is legal under man’s legal landscape. The government controls you by consent. Sometimes it is by silent or tacit consent, but it is consent none-the-less. A maxim of law says, “That which one creates, one controls.” How can the government control you? Did it create you? The answer is that it controls you by you just rolling over and letting it, by consent. From, the changing of the definitions of words, the use of word magic, legalese language, offers to contract and your acceptance of it, the legal fiction, trust actions and the types of trusts, to being called a taxpayer, resident, citizen, person, minor, ward, debtor, surety, incompetent, individual, (yes, these are bad words) being falsely accused of committing crimes when there is no injured party (corpus delicti), tricked into thinking that you have to follow the corporation’s (government) policies, regulations, ordinances, that was created by them for them, and more. I will now attempt to tell the story of how you were commandeered without you even knowing it and hopefully this new gained knowledge will lead you to real freedom, i.e. “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Don’t turn back now…

Cestui Que Vie (Sesta Kay Vee or Setty Kay Vee)

In 1666, during the times of King Henry VIII, England witnessed two monumental events that shaped its historical and legal landscape: the Great Fire of London and the enactment of the Cestui Que Vie Act. Together, these occurrences underscored the fragility of society during times of crisis and led to significant legal and administrative changes.

The Great Fire of London was a devastating conflagration that began in a bakery on Pudding Lane on September 2, 1666. Over the course of four days, the fire engulfed much of the city, consuming over 13,000 homes, 87 churches, and iconic landmarks like Old St. Paul’s Cathedral. Tens of thousands of people were displaced, and while the official death toll was surprisingly low, the undocumented casualties were likely much higher. The fire, exacerbated by the densely packed wooden structures and narrow streets of medieval London, highlighted the urgent need for urban planning and fire prevention measures. In its aftermath, the city embarked on rebuilding efforts, though it largely retained its medieval street layout. The disaster left a lasting mark on London, serving as a catalyst for architectural and infrastructural reforms.

Amid this upheaval, Parliament passed the Cestui Que Vie Act in 1666. This legislation was designed to address the challenges posed by absentee individuals whose lives determined the duration of certain estates. In the chaos following the Great Fire and the preceding Black Plague, many individuals were displaced or unaccounted for, creating uncertainty regarding property ownership and estate management. The act introduced the legal presumption of death for individuals who had been absent for seven years without proof of life. This allowed landlords and reversioners to reclaim possession of property tied to such individuals without prolonged legal disputes. By providing a framework for managing estates under these circumstances, the act streamlined legal processes and ensured continuity during a time of widespread social disruption.

The Birth Certificate

Fast forward 267 years… The US government decided that to take more control of “We the People” and steal everything we have by initializing and entangling maritime/admiralty law, the law merchant, law of the water also known as commerce into the legal system. It is all legal fiction. So, in 1933, the (corporate) United States adopted and implemented the Cestui Que Vie Act during the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act, creating a trust for each birth, i.e. each child born. The State takes money from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Public Charitable Trust and creates a bond with it, therefore monetizing the birth certificate and attaches it to the trust so that it can be traded worldwide and on the NY Stock Exchange. The trust is traded like this in perpetuity and the fund are used to fund government. The trust is given a name at the time of the birth and that name is an all-capitalized (all caps) version of the name that your mother and father gave you. If you were named John David Doe at birth (berth) then the trust (the “social security account”) was named JOHN DAVID DOE. Any name in all caps is a dead entity. Even people that have died and was buried after the early 20th century have tombstones with ALL CAPS names on them. It makes sense if you think about it, a trust is not living so the all-caps name is an appropriate indicator. The trust is a “vessel”. The birth certificate (berth certificate) serves as a “bill of lading” for the “product” (baby) that was “delivered” through the canal (birth canal) on a vessel (mother) via the water (amniotic fluid) and docked by the doctor (dock-tor) in which he provided the manifest and certificate of that delivery. A manifest describes the product that was delivered by the vessel or ship. (Did you ever notice that all vessels/ships are given a woman’s name?) The manifest has the weight, length, blood type, gender, the color or race, the date and time of delivery, the sole prints (soul prints), place of delivery, the delivering M.D., the parents, the name of the hospital, and the registrar’s name and signature. The mother is given a stack of papers to read and sign under duress of pain medications and the pain itself. The mother is entered on the birth certificate documents as an “informant”. I believe in some cases she actually signs as the informant. As informant, she is telling the authorities that there is a new living being (product) that is not registered and is a denizen, one that has not been conferred nationality of a State; therefore, is not a citizen. She essentially was tricked into unknowingly “ratting out” her newborn child. By signing the (long form) birth certificate as informant and releasing it to the authorities, she registers the child. To register anything is to give it away or abandons total parental control of the child. The State takes the position of the parent under the “parens patrae” doctrine. The definition of “parens patrae” per Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Ed. is “Father of his country; parent of the country. In England, the king. In the United States, the state, as a sovereign-referring to the sovereign power of guardianship over persons under disability, such as minors, and insane and incompetent persons.

The birth certificate is a monetized bond (bond=bondage) as shown above, written on bond paper. It has the creation date of the ens legis as the date it was registered with the registrar. On the back of that birth certificate, (go ahead, look at yours) likely at the top left are red numbers indicating the bond number, stock number of the living human. Red indicates the living man. They claim to own you. In their system, poor people are common stock, and rich people are preferred stock.

Edward Mandel House

In 1913, a man named Edward Mandel House who was instrumental in getting Woodrow Wilson elected on November 5th, 1912, had this to say according to different sources:

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

Many sources say that this letter to Wilson is not real and not recorded anywhere and that it just showed up on the internet and has since been circulating. This version was taken from a website called History Heist. You can find it in many places if you search “Edward Mandel House letter to Woodrow Wilson.” The fact remains, whether it is a valid letter or not, this act of causing the American people to be registered by birth certificates for the purpose of monetizing the birth certificates is exactly what happened in that time era and continues.

Asking Ai Targeted Questions on Parens Patrae

I asked Copilot, the artificial intelligence program by Microsoft, “Per MW Law Dictionary, what is the definition of Parens Patrae?” Its answer was “The Merriam-Webster Legal Dictionary defines parens patrae as the state’s role as the legal guardian of individuals who are not sui juris (capable of managing their own affairs) and lack natural guardians. This includes acting as the heir to individuals without natural heirs and protecting citizens unable to safeguard themselves.

I then asked, “Does the government or State claim the position of Parens patrae over “persons” (persons as defined by BLD)” (BLD=Black’s Law Dictionary)

The answer was, “Yes, the government or state often assumes the role of parens patriae over individuals, particularly in the legal context, and this includes “persons” as defined in Black’s Law Dictionary. Black’s Law Dictionary defines “person” broadly, covering natural persons (human beings) as well as legal entities like corporations. Under parens patriae, the government acts as the legal guardian for individuals or entities who cannot protect or manage their own interests. This may occur in cases involving minors, incapacitated adults, or vulnerable populations. It can also apply to broader societal concerns, where the state intervenes in the name of public welfare, such as in child welfare proceedings, guardianship laws, or environmental protection cases.”

Revisiting the previous answer from Ai, I asked, ” ‘This includes acting as the heir to individuals without natural heirs’ meaning that the State is the heirs of the “non-sui juris” individuals?”

Its answer: “Yes, under the principle of parens patriae, the state can act as the heir to individuals who die without natural heirs or identifiable beneficiaries. In such cases, the state claims the right to inherit the estate or manage the property of the deceased. This process is often referred to as escheat, where the property of a deceased individual reverts to the state.

Escheat occurs primarily to prevent property from remaining ownerless or “abandoned,” ensuring that assets are either redistributed or managed by the state in the public interest. It’s a mechanism used in many legal systems to address situations where there are no surviving relatives, heirs, or valid claims to an estate.

This is distinct from the state’s broader role as parens patriae, which extends to protecting individuals who are legally considered unable to care for themselves (e.g., minors or those declared non-sui juris). In the context of inheritance, parens patriae overlaps with the state’s responsibility to resolve estates in absence of natural heirs.”

The Point

In my writing above of mentioning the Cestui Que Vie Trust, and the birth certificate scenario, I was attempting to set up a vision where you can see the actions of the “system”, the legal fiction, the government. In the shortest terms I can muster up, the layout is as follows.

The baby is born, and a birth certificate (ens legis/SSN) is attached to it.
The baby is forced to sign the birth certificate with its footprints.
The mother signs as informant under duress, thus giving away the child.
The State assumes parental power as the parent under the “Parens Patrae doctrine” through the registration of the child.
The State acquires funds from the Public Charitable Trust, the IMF.
The funds are securitized as a bond. (An excess of $6.4K – $5M initial investment, depending on birthdate)
A trust is created from the funds by the State as grantor and the child being the beneficiary.
The child has 7 years to claim this trust.
After 7 years passes without the trust being claimed by the beneficiary, it is presumed that the beneficiary is dead and lost at sea. The State claims the trust because it is presumed to be abandoned as an estate.
Escheat happens because the estate is considered abandoned, and the State claims it.
Because the child never becomes sui juris as a child or adult, and is incompetent, the State maintains the status of parens patrae over it.
Regardless of age, the child/man/woman remains a ward of the State because they are not sui juris.
The child/man/woman dies, the trust estate remains in action under the control of the State, forever.

Be aware that an “estate” in this case is property left behind by the death of someone, the deceased. Above, I mention the “estate” not being claimed becomes the property of the State by escheat. How can someone claim something that requires them to be dead to even call it an estate? It is because when you were born, the placenta was included as being alive. You were first born, cut from the placenta/the mother and then the placenta was born. It was pulsing and you were crying, now there are briefly two “living entities”, you and the placenta that share the exact same DNA. It does not flourish of course and dies. The State claimed the placenta whether they take it or not. They gave this entity the all-caps name and you were given the living entity’s name. The dead entity now represents the ens legis [JOHN DAVID DOE] and you were given the proper name [John David Doe]. The estate belongs to the ens legis, and is the trustee but you are the beneficiary of it. You must claim it before 7 years or it is considered abandoned and the State salvages it. I’ve heard that the Smithsonian Institute, Museum Support Center stores the placentas/DNA. Is this true? I haven’t been able to vet that info, but interesting none-the-less. If you know this to be true or have information on this, drop me a message and your references. Does all of this sound Satanic? You know it.

Vetting The SSN

The SS Card on the left has a place for the signature of the “employee”. Also notice that is has the words “Account Number” at the top. They removed the words “Account Number” later to hide that it is actually an account. On the card on the right, the rear of the SS card says, ” This card belongs to the Social Security Administration” and then goes on to say, “If you find a card that isn’t yours, [that would include the one you have] please return it to: Social Security Administration” The lower card has the red digits indicating which Federal Reserve Bank the trust is being held in and the red numbers is the routing number. So why are you keeping a card that does not belong to you? Continuing…

In my vetting of the information, I’ve provided herein, I was privy to a website that I visited in 2023. It was a website where you could see the trading of bonds. The address of that website was gmei.com. It was called as best I can remember, GMEI Utility. If you had the bond number, it would show you the trading information regarding it. It was there that I decided to test whether the social security number was indeed attached to a bond or if it was a number of a bond. I entered the SS number, and without hesitation, it pulled up hundreds of corporations worldwide that were trading on that number. I’ve known the social security number of my father by heart because he told it to me many times. He passed away in 1993. Now keep in mind he had been deceased for 30 years. When I entered the SSN regarding him, it again pulled up hundreds of corporations worldwide that were trading on the relative social security numbers. I tried my stepchildren’s (ens legis) numbers, the SSN my brother uses with all of the same results. I showed it to my brother, and he saw it for himself. Later in 2023, the website that showed the GMEI Utility, displayed a message that public access to it would be stopped and the data moved to a new location. Sure enough, later in 2023, access was cut off.

Now when you search “GMEI Utility” you arrive at a website “www.legalidentifier.com/gmei-utility-vs-lei-register” On that page it says, “GMEI Utility vs LEI Register: The Global LEI System encourages competition between LEI issuers and registrators to benefit legal entities seeking an LEI. Therefore, the price of issuing and maintaining an LEI has been left to the organizations themselves. This explains why some companies charge double the price of their competitors.

On July 27 2023, the GMEI Utility was officially closed. Registrations, renewals and transfers are no longer accepted.“

LEI means Legal Entity Identifier. That is exactly what a social security number is. It is a legal entity identifier of the non-living ens legis, the all-caps name on the birth certificate. It is not an identifier of you. You are a living entity, a living man or woman. (FYI: The terms “male” and “female” indicate the gender of animals. Animals do not have rights. A little trickery they throw at you to gain more control over you.) The social security card has the ens legis name on it in all-caps letters, [Ex. JOHN DAVID DOE] That is not you and does not represent you. It is the trustee of the estate and you; the living man or woman are the beneficiaries of the estate (SS account). “Ens legis” is a Latin word that means something created by law. It’s not a real or physical thing—it’s a legal idea, like a company or trust that exists only in legal systems and on paper.

The red digit on the back of the Social Security Card has a preceding letter that represents the Federal Reserve Bank the IMF funds are held and the numbers represent the stock of the subject. (Subject=slave) The number is also a routing number.

The following list shows the letter and cusip number list of each Federal Reserve Bank.

A – Boston (1st District) 0110-0001-5
B – New York (2nd District) 0210-0120-8
C – Philadelphia (3rd District) 0310-0004-0
D – Cleveland (4th District) 0410-0001-4
E – Richmond (5th District) 0510-0003-3
F – Atlanta (6th District) 0610-0014-6
G – Chicago (7th District) 0710-0030-1
H – St. Louis (8th District) 0810-004-5
I – Minneapolis (9th District) 0910-0008-0
J – Kansa City (10th District) 1010-0004-8
K – Dallas (11t District) 1110-0003-8
L – San Francisco (12th District) 1210-0037-4

Example C123456789 The number on the front with the dashes (Ex. 234-56-7890) is the open SSN account number and represents the debtor/ens legis i.e. the all-capitalized NAME. That same number without dashes represents the Secured Party Creditor, the living man or woman. As you already know from the info above, on the back of the SS Card that it says, “Property of the Social Security Administration.” This is proof that it is not your card. Yet, you use it as if it were. Why? Because you were tricked into thinking that the NAME on the front of the card is you. Trust me, it isn’t. Saying that you are that name causes you to be the surety, the debtor, the slave by proxy, the trustee. You are the beneficiary, not the trustee of that trust. It is all commerce. We’ll get more into this soon.

Black’s Law Dictionary defines: “ENS LEGIS. L. Lat. A creature of the law; an artificial being, as contrasted with a natural person. Applied to corporations, considered as deriving their existence entirely from the law.” A STATE created entity.

Are you an artificial entity? I certainly hope not!

Movies with Hidden Messages

In the movie Alice in Wonderland, they show us clearly and right in our faces of the lawful/legal fiction system. People take these movies as simple entertainment and give no consideration to the underlying meanings and allegories. The following is a simple analysis of that movie.

Another movie is The Wizard of Oz. The movie was released around the time that the Federal Reserve Act was passed, and all of the gold (real money) was stolen by the government and ultimately those behind the curtains.

This system of lawful versus legal is everywhere. It is actually world-wide. They flaunt it in your face, show it to you in movies, written stories and in discussions. The court is chocked full of evidence of fraud against We the People. If everyone would catch on, accept the Paradigm shift of reality that happens when exposed to this information and help spread it to the rest of the people all round the Earth, the system will eventually collapse. All that need to happen is to spread the Truth. Just so you know, Satan is the ruler of this world. “World” is defined in the bible as “The system of things.” By that definition, Satan is the ruler of the “system”. Here is a verse to support that Satan is the ruler of this world:

“2 Corinthians 4:4 from the King James Version (KJV):“In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.”

Here are a few more verses:

John 12:31—”Now judgment is upon this world; now the ruler of this world will be cast out.”

John 14:30—”I will not speak much more with you, for the ruler of the world is coming, and he has nothing in Me.”

John 16:11—”And concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world has been judged.”

These passages reveal that Satan holds temporary dominion over worldly affairs, influencing deception, corruption, and spiritual blindness. However, they also affirm that his rule is not absolute and will ultimately be overthrown. The system will definitely fall eventually.

Do your part and spread the truth. Spread this website address and name. Raveninfo.com Do your due diligence and show yourself approved, learn everything you can, vet the information you discover and receive.

All contents within any part of Raveninfo.com is for educational purposes and entertainment only. Nothing within is to be taken as legal advice, however; it may be taken as lawful information.